business

Big 12's Zero-Tolerance Policy on Anti-LDS Chants: A New Era for BYU

2026-07-07 · The Daily Utahan Desk

The Big 12 Conference has drawn a firm line in the sand. Commissioner Brett Yormark’s declaration of a zero-tolerance policy for anti-LDS chants targeting Brigham Young University is more than a procedural update—it’s a statement about the conference’s evolving identity. For BYU, a university deeply tied to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, this policy addresses a recurring issue that has followed the Cougars across decades of play, from the Mountain West to independent status and now into the Power Five. The chants, often heard in hostile arenas, have been a point of contention for fans and players alike. Now, the Big 12 is signaling that such behavior will no longer be part of the game day experience.

Beyond the Court: A Cultural Shift in College Athletics

The commissioner’s statement carries weight beyond the conference’s bylaws. It reflects a broader reckoning with the role of religion in public spaces, particularly in college sports where institutional values often clash with fan culture. BYU, as a private university owned by the LDS Church, has long been a target for such taunts. The Big 12’s decision to adopt a zero-tolerance policy is a notable departure from the often-laissez-faire attitude toward fan conduct in other conferences. This move signals that the conference is willing to prioritize respect and inclusion over a more permissive game-day atmosphere.

However, this policy raises questions about enforcement. How will officials distinguish between a coordinated chant and a spontaneous outburst? Will the conference penalize entire student sections, or will it focus on individual offenders? The commissioner’s statement suggests a firm stance, but the practical application will be tested in the heat of rivalry games. The policy’s success will hinge on consistent, transparent enforcement—something that has eluded other conferences in similar situations. The Big 12 is setting a precedent, and all eyes will be on how it handles the inevitable challenges.

The implications extend beyond BYU. This policy signals that the Big 12 is willing to take a stand on cultural and religious respect, potentially influencing how other conferences address similar issues. It also places BYU in a unique position, as the university’s Honor Code and religious identity have often been points of contention. By enforcing this policy, the conference is not only protecting BYU players and fans but also affirming that religious intolerance has no place in collegiate athletics. This could reshape the atmosphere at road games for BYU, making them less hostile and more focused on competition.